Skip to main content
Comparison

SynthGuard vs StealthGPT — text modes and tool breadth compared.

Compare StealthGPT with SynthGuard's local Light mode and disclosed Standard/Aggressive inference modes. Verify current third-party terms before submitting sensitive text.

Try Text Humanizer free Local media · disclosed text modes
Feature SynthGuard StealthGPT
Architecture Light local; deeper modes via inference route Check current product documentation
Data exposure Mode-specific disclosure Check current privacy policy
Speed Sub-second for 5,000 words Limited by API latency
Image humanization Yes No
Video humanization Yes No
Cost model Flat $14.99/mo Pro Token-based, scales with use
Languages EN + DE native EN primarily

StealthGPT's approach is to use other LLMs as the humanizer — your AI text gets re-prompted through a chain of models that rewrite it in a more human voice. The output quality is good, but the architecture means your text travels through multiple third-party APIs and there's no way to know exactly what gets logged where.

SynthGuard Light mode is algorithmic: it applies deterministic browser-side edits. Standard and Aggressive use the disclosed inference route for deeper rewriting, so privacy and speed comparisons must be made mode by mode.

Speed matters at scale. StealthGPT's API roundtrip puts a floor on processing time — even a fast LLM takes 1–3 seconds per paragraph. SynthGuard processes 5,000 words in under a second because there's no network roundtrip.

If you're a high-volume user (10,000+ words a day), the cost difference is significant. StealthGPT charges per token used; SynthGuard's Pro tier is flat at $14.99/month for 50 humanizations.

The image and video humanization features are exclusive to SynthGuard — StealthGPT is text-only.

Try SynthGuard — free account, no card required

Free tier: 3 credits per week. Pro: $14.99/mo for 50 credits, all camera profiles, video export and advanced controls.

Open the humanizer

Frequently asked questions

Does StealthGPT use OpenAI under the hood?+

They use multiple LLM providers; the exact mix changes. Check their current docs.

Why is SynthGuard faster?+

Light mode avoids an inference roundtrip. Standard and Aggressive trade that speed for deeper rewriting.

Is the rewrite quality similar?+

Both work on current detectors. SynthGuard's deterministic approach is more predictable; StealthGPT's LLM approach can produce more varied outputs.

Can SynthGuard handle very long documents?+

Practical limits depend on the selected mode, browser resources and plan. For long documents, process reviewable sections and preserve terminology between passes.

More comparisons

Related reading